Migration Difficulty Estimator

Migrate from Webflow to Next.js

Stop guessing. Calculate the exact technical difficulty score for moving your specific infrastructure from Webflow to a modern Next.js stack.

Platform Baseline Friction

Moderate (6/10) - Migrating from Webflow involves extracting content from a Builder architecture. Our process handles the mapping of Webflow's proprietary data structures into clean, structured content ready for Next.js.

Start Fresh (Pros)

  • ✓ Significant SEO uplift: Next.js scores 10/10 vs Webflow's 8/10.
  • ✓ Performance boost: Expect faster LCP and TBT metrics on Next.js.
  • ✓ Total design freedom: No more rigid templates or builder restrictions.
  • ✓ Eliminates Webflow pain points like "cms item limits".

Migration Risks (Cons)

  • ⚠ Higher complexity: Requires developer maintenance unlike drag-and-drop builders.
  • ⚠ New layout challenge: High development cost.

Data Transferability Matrix

✅ Blog Posts & Pages
Automated
Full Automated Export
✅ Images & Media
Automated
Migrated to CDN
❌ Visual Design
Manual
Recreated as Custom Code
❌ Widgets & Logic
Manual
Replaced with Custom Functions
✅ SEO Rankings
Automated
Preserved via 301 Redirects

* Webflow data structure requires full automated export.

Check Migration Difficulty

Analyze complexity & risk factors

25 Pages
Difficulty Score
Moderate (45/100)

Risk Analysis

  • Architectural shift requires new data modeling.
SEO Impact
Low risk; upgrade offers better SEO controls.
Discuss This Migration

Get a personalized roadmap to mitigate these specific risks.

Platform Comparison

Webflow
  • Export Difficulty: 6/10
  • SEO Capability: 8/10
  • Speed Score: 7/10
  • Current Limitations:
    • • CMS item limits
    • • Hosting costs
    • • Learning curve
    • • Code export limitations
VS
Next.js
  • Export Difficulty: 8/10
  • SEO Capability: 10/10
  • Speed Score: 10/10
  • Why Switch?

    Moving to Next.js eliminates Webflow's key weaknesses, specifically: CMS item limits and Hosting costs.